UPDATE: (7-5-2007) “Senator Blutarsky” pointed out in the comments that something seemed wrong. After looking back at the numbers, it appears that I had transposed two column headers. Previously, in the “received” column I had swapped “21-28″ and “28+” that has now been fixed in the raw numbers and in this post.
Ryan Ferguson over at The FanHouse linked to an article about blow-outs in the SEC. The first thing I noticed when I read the article over at Tracking the Tigers (an AL.com blog) was that it had some bizarre restrictions.
For starters, Marshall left out the worst teams in the conference, only looked back 5 seasons, and it seems that he looked at a coach’s last five seasons, instead of just going back five years. He also set the margin of victory (or loss, in this case) necessary to qualify for a blow-out at an astonishingly low 14 points. I’m fairly certain that I’ve never heard anyone call a 14-point win a “blow-out”. Rather than just criticize the methods, however, I decided to run some numbers of my own.
I went all the way back to 1998, looked at all of the current SEC coaches, and was mainly focused on a per-year rating rather than a raw number. I looked at wins by 21-28, 28+, and 21+. I was also curious about shut-outs, so I tossed those in as well. What follows is a far-too-long analysis, or you can jump right to the raw numbers — (I collected these automatically, so there could be some discrepancies… please let me know if you see any).
(more…)